Castor EDC vs ShareCRF – Find the Best Fit for You

Trying to decide between Castor EDC and ShareCRF? Both are industry-leading solutions, but which one is the best fit for your business? In this detailed comparison, we evaluate their features, pricing, ease of use, and customer support to help you make an informed choice. Whether you need advanced automation, better scalability, or user-friendly interfaces, this guide breaks down everything you need to know to select the right software for your needs.

In-Depth Comparison of Castor EDC and ShareCRF

Product
Review & Ratings

No reviews available

No reviews available
Description

Castor EDC is an advanced data collection software tailored for researchers and organizations seeking efficient and secure ways to gather, manage, and analyze data. It provides a user-friendly platform for designing electronic data capture forms, ensuring accurate and consistent data entry. Castor EDC supports a wide range of data types and offers customizable validation rules to enhance data qual... Read more about Castor EDC

ShareCRF is an electronic data capture (EDC) software solution designed to streamline clinical trials and research studies by simplifying data collection and management. The platform provides researchers and clinical trial teams with a secure, cloud-based system for capturing, storing, and analyzing clinical data. ShareCRF supports the collection of data from multiple sources, including clinical s... Read more about ShareCRF

Free Trial

NA

Available

Starting Price
Category Features
Other Information
Deployment Cloud Hosted Cloud Hosted
Devices Supported Web-Based, Web-Based,
Pricing Model Contact Vendor Contact Vendor
Support Email, Phone, Knowledge Base, FAQs/Forum Email, Phone
Target Company Size
Self-Employed, Small-Business, Midsize-Business,
Self-Employed, Small-Business, Midsize-Business,

FAQs About Castor EDC vs ShareCRF

In conclusion, both Castor EDC and ShareCRF offer robust electronic data capture solutions tailored for clinical research. Castor EDC stands out with its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features, making it suitable for diverse study designs. Conversely, ShareCRF excels in collaborative capabilities and flexibility, catering to multi-site trials effectively. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific project needs, budget considerations, and user preferences, ensuring that researchers can select the platform that best aligns with their objectives.